• Login
    View Item 
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Medicine
    • Department of Anesthesiology
    • Master Theses
    • View Item
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Medicine
    • Department of Anesthesiology
    • Master Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Perbandingan Efektivitas Infiltrasi Anestesi Lokal Ropivakain 0.25% dan Ropivakain 0.375% pada Luka Sayatan Operasi Seksio Sesarea dengan Spinal Anestesi

    Comparison of The Effectiveness of Local Anesthetic Infiltration of 0.25% Ropivacaine and 0.375% Ropivacaine on Cesarean Section Incision with Spinal Anesthesia

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Cover (328.5Kb)
    Fulltext (2.859Mb)
    Date
    2024
    Author
    Siregar, Ahmad Habibi
    Advisor(s)
    Hamdi, Tasrif
    Nadeak, Rommy F
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background: Postoperative pain after a caesarean section impacts recovery and needs effective treatment. Ropivacaine is a local anesthetic used to manage this pain, but there is limited comparison between its 0.25% and 0.375% concentrations. Methods: This randomized controlled trial included 60 patients caesarean section with spinal anesthesia at Haji Adam Malik Medan Hospital RS Haji Medan, Rumah Sakit Prof. Chairuddin P. Lubis USU dan Rumkit TK-II Putri Hijau Medan.. Patients were divided into three groups: ropivacaine 0.25% (n=20), ropivacaine 0.375% (n=20), and a control group (n=20). Pain was measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. Additional analgesic use and side effects were also recorded. Data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05). Results: At T1, there was no significant difference between the groups (p=0.219). However, at T2,T3 and and T4, pain was significantly lower in the ropivacaine groups compared to the control group (p<0.001), but no difference was found between ropivacaine 0.25% and 0.375%. The need for additional fentanyl at T2 was higher in the control group (n=8) compared to the ropivacaine 0.25% (n=3) and ropivacaine 0.375% (n=2) groups. No side effects were reported in any of the groups. Conclusion: Both 0.25% and 0.375% ropivacaine effectively reduce postoperative pain and the need for additional analgesics compared to control group. However, there was no significant difference between two ropivacaine concentrations.
    URI
    https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/100464
    Collections
    • Master Theses [164]

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara (RI-USU)
    Universitas Sumatera Utara | Perpustakaan | Resource Guide | Katalog Perpustakaan
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of USU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara (RI-USU)
    Universitas Sumatera Utara | Perpustakaan | Resource Guide | Katalog Perpustakaan
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV