Pembatalan Akta Hibah dan Jual Beli yang Dibuat di Hadapan Notaris Disebabkan Adanya Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Pembuatan Akta (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 978/PDT.G/2021/PN MDN)
Cancellation of Deeds of Grant and Sale and Purchase Made in the Presence of a Notary Due to Unlawful Acts in Making the Deed (Study of Medan District Court Decision Number 978/PDT.G/2021/PN MDN)

Date
2024Author
Nedytha, Alifya
Advisor(s)
Hasibuan, Puspa Melati
Barus, Utary Maharany
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In a lawsuit that states that the Notary deed is invalid, its invalidity must be
proven both from external, formal, and material aspects. If it cannot be proved,
then the deed in question is still valid and binding for the parties interested in the
deed. If the deed can be proven in court, then there is one aspect that causes the
deed to be defective, so that the deed can become a degraded deed or a deed under
hand. The problem in this study is what is the basis for the Plaintiff to propose the
cancellation of the Grant Deed in the Medan District Court Decision Number
978/Pdt.G/2021/PN Mdn, how is the validity of the evidence owned by the Plaintiff
in the Medan District Court Decision Number 978/Pdt.G/2021/PN Mdn and how
is the Notary's civil liability for the deed canceled by the Court in Medan District
Court Decision Number 978/Pdt.G/2021/PN Mdn.
The basis for the Plaintiff's request for the cancellation of the Grant Deed
in the Medan District Court Decision Number 978/Pdt.G/2021/PN Mdn is the
provisions of Article 52 paragraph (1) and 53 of the Notary Position Law affirming
that in certain circumstances the Notary is prohibited from making a deed, this
prohibition only exists on the legal subject of the witnesses, if the legal subject is
prohibited, then the substance of the deed (his deed) is not allowed to be made. The
meaning of this article is that those mentioned in Article 52 paragraph (1) of the
Notary Office Law are not allowed to make a deed in front of a notary who has a
certain relationship with the Notary concerned. For example, the Notary's sibling
will make power of attorney to the other party. The validity of the evidence
possessed by the Plaintiff in the Medan District Court Decision Number
978/Pdt.G/2021/PN Mdn is the external strength, formal evidentiary power and
material evidentiary power. The notary deed has perfect evidentiary power, unless
it can be proven that the deed is fake. Therefore, if it is used as evidence in court,
the judge must accept the notary deed as a perfect evidence. The power of proving
the material of an authentic deed is a certainty that the parties not only face and
explain to the notary but also prove that they have also done what is stated in the
material of the deed. PPAT's responsibility in the event of the cancellation of the
sale and purchase deed is civil and administrative.
Collections
- Undergraduate Theses [2776]