Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAblisar, Madiasa
dc.contributor.advisorMarlina
dc.contributor.advisorMulyadi, Mahmud
dc.contributor.authorTambunan, Samuel Parsaoran
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-20T03:11:23Z
dc.date.available2025-05-20T03:11:23Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/103911
dc.description.abstractCriminal sanction is The Last Resort which is the last means that must be carried out after other efforts which are coaching and preventive in nature have not been successful. In the Juvenile Criminal Case Decision Number. 14 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2018 / PN.Mdn and Decision Number. 48 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2019 / PN.Mdn, Children was sentenced to imprisonment for theft. The results of the social research report were already included in the basis of the judge's consideration, but the judge's decision was not in line with the recommendation from the Community Advisor who prioritized the development of children. This study will examine and analyze: what is the role of the Community Guidance in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, what the Community Advisors to the Judge for consideration in the decision and what is the position of the Community Research Report in the judge's consideration in decision Number. 14 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2018 / PN.Mdn and Decision Number. 48 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2019 / PN.Mdn. This research is a normative legal research with analytical descriptive character. The data used is secondary data. Secondary data comes from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Secondary data were collected using library research techniques and data collection tools in the form of document studies. The analysis in this study is a qualitative analysis by drawing conclusions deductively, namely drawing conclusions from general matters to specific matters. From the research results it is known in the decision Number. 14 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2018 / PN.Mdn and Decision Number. 48 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2019 / PN.Mdn. The position of the Community Research Report is for reference only. The judge did not even consider that in this case a peace had been made between the victim witness and the child. In examining and deciding cases, judges should be able to consider the Community Research Report in depth.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectCommunity Research Reporten_US
dc.subjectChild Criminal Justice Systemen_US
dc.subjectCriminal Sanctionsen_US
dc.titleAnalisis Hukum Kedudukan Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan pada Putusan Pidana Anak (Studi Putusan No. 14/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/PN.Mdn dan Putusan No. 48/Pid.Sus-Anak/2019/PN.Mdn)en_US
dc.title.alternativeLegal Analysis of The Standing of Community Research Reports on Child Criminal Decisions (Study of Decision No. 14/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/PN.Mdn and Decision No. 48/Pid.Sus- Anak/2019/PN.Mdn)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM167005022
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0008046103
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0007037501
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0001047403
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74101#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages109 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 16. Peace, Justice And Strong Institutionsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record