Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorNasution, Zulkifli
dc.contributor.advisorRujiman
dc.contributor.advisorGinting, Nurlisa
dc.contributor.authorHutagalung, Poppy Marulita
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-27T08:31:49Z
dc.date.available2025-05-27T08:31:49Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/104156
dc.description.abstractEfforts to develop a sustainable region pay attention to integrated socio-economic, ecological and institutional aspects, aiming to improve the welfare of the community with the concept of inclusive development, involving various components of society where tourism activities are directly related to these aspects. Geotourism, one of the fastest growing tourism segments globally, takes place in a geopark area with the concept of sustainable development developing Geoproducts as geotourism products, as tourism products inspired by geodiversity in a geopark. In 2020, the Lake Toba area, especially Samosir Island, was designated as a member of the UNESCO Global Geopark (UGG). This is a challenge for the development of Geoproducts in geotourism on Samosir Island. Geoproducts have a special philosophy that differentiates them from other tourism products, namely: geological relationships; economic feasibility and partnership relationships as well as brand as the identity of a geopark area and in the context of sustainable regional development have development aspects, namely Geological Relations, Economic Feasibility, Partnership Relations and Brands as tools for geopark promotion in geotourism. With mix method research through SEM PLS analysis, a model was formulated to understand the influence of Geological Relations; Economic Feasibility, Partnership Relations, Brands for Regional Development through Geoproduk mediation on Samosir Island, especially on the supply side from Geoproduk Actors. The results obtained show that Geological Relations; Economic Feasibility and Brand have an influence on Geoproducts, but have no effect on Partnership Relations, whereas Economic Feasibility, Partnership Relations and Brand have no influence on Regional Development. Geological Relations, Economic Feasibility and Brand through Geoproduct mediation influence Regional Development but not Partnership Relations. The conclusion can be drawn that various Geoproducts as tourism products cannot yet be declared true Geoproducts because they do not meet the philosophy in implementing Economic Feasibility, Partnership and Brand Relationships in carrying out an important role in balancing sustainable development through inclusive tourism. This condition is a suggestion and recommendation for the future development of Geoproducts in the Kadera Toba Geopark.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectregional developmenten_US
dc.subjectgeoproducten_US
dc.subjectgeological relationshipen_US
dc.subjecteconomic feasibilityen_US
dc.subjectpartnership relationsen_US
dc.subjectbranden_US
dc.titleAnalisa Aspek Aspek Geoproduk terhadap Pengembangan Wilayah di Pulau Samosiren_US
dc.title.alternativeAnalysis of Geoproduct Aspects on Regional Development in Samosir Islanden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM198105023
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0015085909
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN8899040017
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0009016202
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI95003#Perencanaan Wilayah
dc.description.pages299 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeDisertasi Doktoren_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 17. Partnerships For The Goalsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record