dc.contributor.advisor | Sirait, Ningrum Natasya | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Lubis, Tri Murti | |
dc.contributor.author | Kacaribu, Ajwa Ananda | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-12T03:23:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-06-12T03:23:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/104312 | |
dc.description.abstract | Predatory pricing is a practice that is prohibited under competition law in various countries,
including Indonesia and the European Union. Indonesia has prohibited predatory pricing
through Article 20 of Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic
Practices and Unfair Business Competition, while the European Union prohibits it under
Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. However, predatory
pricing practices continue to be found, such as those conducted by PT Conch South
Kalimantan Cement in Indonesia and Qualcomm in the European Union.
This thesis aims to analyze the differences in the regulation and enforcement of competition
law regarding predatory pricing practices between Indonesia and the European Union. The
research method employed is normative legal research, utilizing statutory, case-based, and
comparative approaches. This study is descriptive, illustrating the legal phenomena
observed through literature studies.
There are several differences and similarities between Indonesia and the European Union
in addressing predatory pricing practices. The differences include the sources of
competition law regulations concerning the prohibition of predatory pricing, the
competition regulatory authorities, and the mechanisms for enforcing competition law to
address predatory pricing. There are also some similarities, such as the approach used to
determine the occurrence of predatory pricing and the sanctions imposed on businesses
found guilty of engaging in predatory pricing practices. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | id | en_US |
dc.publisher | Universitas Sumatera Utara | en_US |
dc.subject | Predatory Pricing | en_US |
dc.subject | Conch | en_US |
dc.subject | Qualcomm | en_US |
dc.subject | European Union | en_US |
dc.subject | Indonesia | en_US |
dc.title | Analisa Perbandingan Praktek Jual Rugi (Predatory Pricing) PT Conch South Kalimantan Cement di Indonesia dengan Qualcomm di Uni Eropa Ditinjau dari Hukum Persaingan Usaha Indonesia dan Uni Eropa | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Comparative Analysis of Predatory Pricing Practices: PT Conch South Kalimantan Cement in Indonesia and Qualcomm in the European Union Under the Competition Law of Indonesia and the European Union | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.identifier.nim | NIM210200111 | |
dc.identifier.nidn | NIDN0017016203 | |
dc.identifier.nidn | NIDN0012128603 | |
dc.identifier.kodeprodi | KODEPRODI74201#Ilmu Hukum | |
dc.description.pages | 187 Pages | en_US |
dc.description.type | Skripsi Sarjana | en_US |
dc.subject.sdgs | SDGs 8. Decent Work And Economic Growth | en_US |