Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSirait, Ningrum Natasya
dc.contributor.advisorLubis, Tri Murti
dc.contributor.authorKacaribu, Ajwa Ananda
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-12T03:23:26Z
dc.date.available2025-06-12T03:23:26Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/104312
dc.description.abstractPredatory pricing is a practice that is prohibited under competition law in various countries, including Indonesia and the European Union. Indonesia has prohibited predatory pricing through Article 20 of Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, while the European Union prohibits it under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. However, predatory pricing practices continue to be found, such as those conducted by PT Conch South Kalimantan Cement in Indonesia and Qualcomm in the European Union. This thesis aims to analyze the differences in the regulation and enforcement of competition law regarding predatory pricing practices between Indonesia and the European Union. The research method employed is normative legal research, utilizing statutory, case-based, and comparative approaches. This study is descriptive, illustrating the legal phenomena observed through literature studies. There are several differences and similarities between Indonesia and the European Union in addressing predatory pricing practices. The differences include the sources of competition law regulations concerning the prohibition of predatory pricing, the competition regulatory authorities, and the mechanisms for enforcing competition law to address predatory pricing. There are also some similarities, such as the approach used to determine the occurrence of predatory pricing and the sanctions imposed on businesses found guilty of engaging in predatory pricing practices.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectPredatory Pricingen_US
dc.subjectConchen_US
dc.subjectQualcommen_US
dc.subjectEuropean Unionen_US
dc.subjectIndonesiaen_US
dc.titleAnalisa Perbandingan Praktek Jual Rugi (Predatory Pricing) PT Conch South Kalimantan Cement di Indonesia dengan Qualcomm di Uni Eropa Ditinjau dari Hukum Persaingan Usaha Indonesia dan Uni Eropaen_US
dc.title.alternativeComparative Analysis of Predatory Pricing Practices: PT Conch South Kalimantan Cement in Indonesia and Qualcomm in the European Union Under the Competition Law of Indonesia and the European Unionen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM210200111
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0017016203
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0012128603
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74201#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages187 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 8. Decent Work And Economic Growthen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record