Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKamello, Tan
dc.contributor.advisorAzwar, Tengku Keizerina Devi
dc.contributor.authorJovanca, Syifa Meutia
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-18T07:09:42Z
dc.date.available2025-06-18T07:09:42Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/104423
dc.description.abstractThe creative economy has become a growing trend in society due to its nature as an intangible asset with significant economic and investment potential. It is considered a renewable and unlimited resource. This sector includes ideas, concepts, and human creativity, all of which are highly dependent on the protection and enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). In the development process, IPR arising from the creative economy can be used as fiduciary collateral with government facilitation. This is stipulated in Article 16 paragraph (1) of Law No. 24/2019, which mandates the government to support creative economy actors through intellectual property-based financing schemes, enabling them to obtain funding or credit from banking and non-banking financial institutions. This research aims to examine the regulation of creative economy products as objects of fiduciary collateral and the challenges involved in utilizing such products for that purpose. This study uses normative legal research methods, relying on secondary data sources, including primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Data were collected using literature review techniques and analyzed using qualitative data analysis methods. The results of this study conclude that although there are 17 sub-sectors within the creative economy, not all products can automatically be used as fiduciary collateral. There are four key requirements that must be fulfilled: a creative economy business financing proposal, proof of ownership of the intellectual property of the product, proof of ownership of the creative economy business, and an intellectual property certificate. In practice, implementation is still hindered by the absence of technical guidelines for the intellectual property-based financing scheme, unclear valuation systems for intellectual property assets, and a lack of certified intellectual property appraisal institutions authorized by the government.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectCreative Economyen_US
dc.subjectSecurity Lawen_US
dc.subjectFiduciary Guaranteeen_US
dc.titleProduk Ekonomi Kreatif sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Kaitannya dengan Undang-Undang No 24 Tahun 2019 tentang Ekonomi Kreatifen_US
dc.title.alternativeCreative Economy Product as Fiduciary Collateral Object Related To Law No. 24/2019 About Creative Economyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM210200146
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0021046206
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0001027001
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74201#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages101 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 8. Decent Work And Economic Growthen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record