Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKaban, Maria
dc.contributor.advisorAflah
dc.contributor.authorJaydon, Gilbert
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-24T02:54:13Z
dc.date.available2025-07-24T02:54:13Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/106683
dc.description.abstractSale and purchase is a common transaction conducted by the public, typically formilized through a sale and purchase agreement. In Indonesia, the practice of transacting uncertified land is still widespread, often based on the principle of trust between the seller and the buyer This practice has the potential to cause future land disputes due to the lack of sufficient proof of land ownership The primary focus of this research is to examine the regulation of good faith in the sale and purchase of uncertified land and to identify the legal standing of a deed of release of rights concerning such land transactions in relation to unlawful acts committed by a third party. Furthermore, this research analyzes the judicial considerations in Decision Number 670/PDT.G/2023/PN Mdn in conjunction with Decision Number 335/PDT/2024/PT Mdn. The research method applied is the normative juridical method, wherein law is conceptualized as what is written in statutory regulations or as rules and norms that serve as guidelines for human conduct. The research findings indicate that the good faith of parties involved in a land sale and purchase must consider both subjective and objective dimensions, adhering to procedures and utilizing valid documents as required by law, and exercising due diligence in examining matters related to the object of the sale. This study shows that although a deed of release of rights is prepared by a notary and constitutes an authentic deed proving the relinquishment of rights, it does not provide the same level of legal certainty as a land title certificate Moreover, the research reveals that the judicial considerations of the Panel of Judges in resolving disputes concerning unlawful acts at the first instance and appellate levels differ in their application of the principle of legal certainty and the principle of a simple, speedy, and low-cost trial.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniveristas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectActen_US
dc.subjectUnlawfulen_US
dc.subjectLanden_US
dc.subjectCertificateen_US
dc.subjectSale and Purchaseen_US
dc.titleTinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Tentang Jual Beli Tanah Belum Bersertifikat (Studi Putusan No. 670/Pdt.G/2023/PN Mdn jo. Putusan No. 335/Pdt/2024/PT Mdn)en_US
dc.title.alternativeJudicial Review of Unlawful Acts Concerning The Sale and Purchase of Uncertified Land (Case Study of Decision No. 670/Pdt.G/2023/PN Mdn jo. Decision No. 335/Pdt/2024/PT Mdn)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM210200435
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0025126010
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0019057001
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74201#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages115 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 16. Peace, Justice And Strong Institutionsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record