Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAzwar, Tengku Keizerina Devi
dc.contributor.advisorLubis, Tri Murti
dc.contributor.authorSimatupang, Yohana Theresya Anggreeni
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-24T04:17:11Z
dc.date.available2025-07-24T04:17:11Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/106929
dc.description.abstractThe importance of holding a General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) in a company lies as the absolute responsibility of the Board of Directors, as the organ entrusted with the authority and duty to manage the company. However, the implementation of the GMS is also inseparable from the role of the Board of Commissioners, which has the authority and duty to supervise and provide advice to the Board of Directors regarding their management actions. The roles of the Board of Directors and the Board of Commissioners in the implementation of the GMS within the company can be observed through Civil Court Decision Number 214/Pdt.G/2021. This thesis discusses three main research questions: (1) What are the responsibilities of the Board of Directors and the Board of Commissioners in managing a Limited Liability Company? (2) How is the principle of fiduciary duty applied in the management of a Limited Liability Company by the Board of Directors and the Board of Commissioners? and (3) How is the principle of fiduciary duty applied in the North Jakarta District Court Decision Number 214/Pdt.G/2021? The research method used in this thesis is normative legal research. The data sources utilized include primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, using a literature study technique. This study concludes that the responsibilities of the Board of Directors and the Board of Commissioners are regulated under Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. The panel of judges in Civil Case Number 214/Pdt.G/2021 has upheld the application of the fiduciary duty principle to both the Board of Directors and the Board of Commissioners. Based on the research findings, it is recommended that the government promptly establish more detailed and operational implementing regulations concerning the responsibilities of directors and commissioners in limited liability companies. Furthermore, it is advised that all directors and commissioners within a company adhere to the fiduciary duty principle as a form of fiduciary responsibility. Notaries, as public officials responsible for drafting corporate deeds, are also advised to comply with legal provisions to ensure the validity and legal force of such deeds.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectFiduciary Dutyen_US
dc.subjectGMSen_US
dc.subjectDirectorsen_US
dc.subjectBoard of Commissionersen_US
dc.titlePrinsip Fiduciary Duty dalam Pelaksanaan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham pada Perseroan Terbatas (Studi Putusan Nomor 214/Pdt.G/2021/Pn.Jkt.Utr)en_US
dc.title.alternativeThe Principle of Fiduciary Duty in The Implementation of The General Meeting Of Shareholders in A Limited Liability Company (Study Of Decision Number 214/Pdt.G/2021)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM210200566
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0001027001
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0012128603
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74201#Ilmu Hukum
dc.description.pages109 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 17. Partnerships For The Goalsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record