Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSaragih, Amrin
dc.contributor.advisorLubis, Syahron
dc.contributor.advisorSilalahi, Roswita
dc.contributor.authorSinambela, Erika
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-08T09:39:13Z
dc.date.available2019-10-08T09:39:13Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/19368
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation deals with investigation of equivalence of metaphors categories (MC) exist in Indonesian newspapers, i.e. Kompas (as the Text 1 (T1)) and the Jakarta Post (as Text 2 (T2). The investigation in this dissertation were focused on four different news articles (NAs), i.e. (1) Politics (P), (2) Business (B), (3) Sports (S), and (4) Criminals (C). These four types of NAs were analysed based on the three research problems, i.e. (1) What types of MC exist in all types of news of the two newspapers (Kompas and The Jakarta Post)? (2) How are the metaphor category equivalent in all types of news articles of the two newspapers? (3) Why are the metaphorical expressions found in the two news articles conceptualized? Qualitative descriptive method was used in this analysis. The results of the analysis (1) The MC that frequently exist in all types of NAs were as the following: In P, B, S, and C NAs, the dominant MC was Str. They were 40%, 65.5%, 64.5% and 80% respectively. The difference was in the use of other MCs such as Ont and Ori in some various numbers, with the exeptional C NA with no Ori category but with 20% Ont one. The results of the third analysis were in two folds, i.e. (i) the translation of MCs with the same ways (equivalence), and (ii) with different ways (shift). Those sentences that were transfered with the same MCs were P NAs, 47,5% T1 Str MC was transfered in the same way to T2, and 12,5% T1 Ont MC was also transfered in the same way. The changing process from T1 to T2 with the same MC was called equivalence. The rests (40%) that were differently transfered from T1 to T2 were called shift in MC. In B news articles, 26,6% of the T1, Ont metaphor and Str MCs were transfered in the same ways. The rests (13,3%) were called shift. In S news article, 39,2% T1 Str (MC) and 28,5% Ont MC are transfered to T2 in the same ways. The rests of them 32,3% were called shift. In C NAs, 80% T1 Str MC were transfered in the same way to T2 and 20% T1 Ont MC are transfered in the same way to T2. Related to the conceptualization of metaphorical expressions (ME), the findings can be stated as (i) ME in P NAs such as the conceptual metaphors elections are (1) A BATTLE and (2) elections are A CONTEST. (ii) ME in B NAs, (1) the business is AN ORGANISM, (2) the state of the business is frequently conceptualised as PHYSICAL/MENTAL HEALTH. (3) market movements in business are PHYSICAL MOVEMENTS. (iii) ME in S NAs as (1) Sports mean WAR. (2) Sports mean BATTLE AND STRATEGY. (3) Sports mean a PHYSICAL CONTEST. (iv) ME in C NAs such as (1) ASSESSMENT OR PREJUDICE; (2) Crimes mean THREATHENING; and (3) Crimes mean ASSAULTING .en_US
dc.description.abstractDisertasi ini menginvestigasi ekivalensi kategorisasi metafora yang ada dalam dua surat kabar di Indonesia, yaitu harian Kompas (sebagai Teks1 (T1)) dan Jakarta Post (sebagai Teks 2 (T2)). Fokus kajian disertasi ini adalah empat artikel berita, yaitu (1) Politik (P), (2) Bisnis (B), (3) Olahraga (O), dan (4) Kriminal (K). Ada empat masalah penelitian yang dibahas, yaitu, (1) Kategori metafora (KM) apa sajakah yang muncul di dalam keempat artikel dimaksud? (2) Bagaimanakah kategori metafora eqivalen dalam semua jenis artikel berita dari kedua koran tersebut? dan (3) Mengapakah ekspresi metaforis (EM) yang ditemukan pada teks tersebut dikonseptualisasikan? Metode deskriptif kualitatif digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Hasil analisis diperoleh bahwa ketiga KM (Str dan Ori (berdasar pada kesadaran dan ketaksadaran dan fisik), dan Ont ditemukan di keempat artikel itu didominasi oleh KM Str dengan tingkat dominasi yang berbeda. (1) P (40%), (2) B (66.6%), (3) O (64.5%), dan (4) K (80%). KM lainnya tersebar di semua artikel dengan tingkat persen yang berbeda kecuali artikel K, metafora kategori Ori tidak ditemukan. Masalah kedua, yakni ekivalensi kategorisai metafora dan yang tak ekivalen atau pergeseran. 47.5% MK Str dalam artikel P ditransfer dengan kategori yang sama; 12.5% MK Ont juga sama. Sementara selebihnya (40%) dinyatakan bergeser. Dalam artikel B 26.6% MK Ont dan Str dinyatakan ekivalen dan selebihnya (13,3%) bergeser. Dalam artikel O, 39.2% MK Str dan 28.5% Ont T1 ditransfer ke T2 dengan cara yang sama, selebihnya (32.3%) dinyatakan bergeser. Dalam artikel K 80% MK Str T1 ditransfer ke T2 dengan cara yang sama dan selebihnya (20%) dinyatakan bergeser. Jawaban masalah penelitian ketiga, yaitu konseptualisasi ekspresi metaforis (EM) diperoleh: (i) EM dalam artikel P bahwa MK pemilihan umum adalah (1) SEBUAH PERTEMPURAN, SEBUAH PERTANDINGAN; (ii) EM artikel B adalah (1) SEBUAH ORGANISME; (2) KESEHATAN FISIK/MENTAL, and (3) Pergerakan pasar dalam bisnis adalah PERGERAKAN FISIK. (iii) EM dalam artikel O bermakna (1) PERANG, (2) PERANG DAN STRATEGI, (3) ADU FISIK; (IV) EM dalam teks kriminal antara lain (1) Kriminal berarti PENGUJIAN ATAU PRADUGA; (2) ANCAMAN; dan (3) PEMERKOSAAN.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectKategorisasi Metaforaen_US
dc.subjectArtikel Surat Kabaren_US
dc.subjectEkivalenen_US
dc.subjectPergeseranen_US
dc.subjectEkspresi Metaforaen_US
dc.titleThe Equivalence of Metaphors in Kompas and The Jakarta Post Newspapersen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM098107016
dc.description.pages406 Halamanen_US
dc.description.typeDisertasi Doktoren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record