Perbedaan Tingkat Akurasi Skala Face Arm Speech Test, Skala Los Angeles Pre-Hospital Stroke Screen, dan Skala Recognition of Stroke In The Emergency Room dalam Mengidentifikasi Pasien Stroke di Instalasi Gawat Darurat
View/ Open
Date
2016Author
Ginting, Suska Lara
Advisor(s)
Dhanu, Rusli
Fitri, Fasihah Irfani
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background and Purpose
Accurate identification of stroke is important and can expedite triage of patient to acute stroke unit and facilitate delivery of acute stroke therapies in hospital. The Face Arm Speech Test (FAST) is brief, reliable tool that is simple to administer. In the past, the Recognition of Stroke in Emergency Room (ROSIER) was not better than the FAST for recognition of stroke. The paramedics of Beijing used Los Angeles Pre-hospital Stroke Scale as a screening tool to identify stroke and also to exclude stroke mimics.
Objective
The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of FAST, LAPSS, ROSIER scale for Identification Stroke Patient in Emergency Room.
Methods
This cross sectional study involved 66 subjects of suspected stroke in emergency room. All subjects were examined for FAST, LAPSS, ROSIER scale , Head CT scan.
Results
The FAST showed sensitivity 76.2%, specificity 66.7%, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) 98%, Negative Predictive Value (NPV) 11.8%, Likelihood Rasio (LR)+ = 2.29, LR-= 0.36, Accuracy 76%. The LAPSS showed sensitivity 39.7%, specificity 66.7%, PPV 96.2%, NPV 5.0%, LR+ = 1.19, LR- = 0.9, Accuracy 41%. The ROSIER showed sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 66.7%, PPV 97.7%, NPV 8.7%, LR+ = 2.0, LR-= 0.5, Accuracy 67%. In Conciousness patient sensitivity were higher than before FAST 90.9% better than LAPSS 52.3% and ROSIER 86.4%. We excluded subject onset >24 hours sensitivity were higher than before, FAST (94.3%) better than LAPSS (74.3%) and ROSIER (88.6%) but Specificity LAPSS 100% better than FAST and ROSIER (50%). Accuracy FAST (91.9%) was better than LAPSS (74.3%) with p=0,99. Accuracy FAST better than ROSIER (86.5%) p=0.88 and Accuracy ROSIER better than LAPSS with p=0.98
Conclusion
The FAST is better than LAPSS and ROSIER for identification stroke because of highest diagnostic accuracy with unsignificant difference. The comprehensive clinical and radiologic assessment is still important.
Collections
- Master Theses [156]
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Perbandingan Tingkat Akurasi Siriraj Stroke Score, Allen Stroke Score, Besson Stroke Score dan Algoritma Stroke Gadjah Mada dalam Menentukan Jenis Stroke pada Fase Akut
Sembiring, Nirwan (Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2017)Introduction: Stroke was one of the cause of death globally. Head CT-Scan examination was very important to differentiate ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke but the cost was very expensive and the availability of the ... -
Perbandingan Tingkat Akurasi Skor Klinis Age, Atrial Fibrilation, Dysphagia, Stroke Severity, Sex (A2DS2) dengan Acute Ischemic Stroke-Associated Pneumonia Score (AIS-APS) Terhadap Kejadian Pneumonia pada Stroke Iskemik Akut
Siregar, Denis Harli (Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2019)Latar Belakang — Pneumonia pasca stroke adalah komplikasi yang dapat dicegah secara potensial setelah stroke yang dikaitkan dengan hasil yang buruk. Tujuan— Kami membandingkan dua skor prognostik untuk memprediksi pneumonia ... -
Perbandingan Outcome Klinis Stroke Sirkulasi Anterior dan Stroke Sirkulasi Posterior pada Pasien Stroke Iskemik Akut
Riana, Caisar (Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2020)Background: Approximately 80% of strokes are ischemic, with posterior circulation ischemic strokes accounting for 20% of stroke cases. Twenty percent of the 150,000 cases of ischemic stroke in the United Kingdom annually ...