Penilaian MPV dan Agregasi Trombosit pada Penderita Diabetes Mellitus Tipe 2
View/ Open
Date
2013Author
Nasution, Malayana Rahmita
Advisor(s)
Aman, Adi Koesoema
Lindarto, Dharma
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Diabetes mellitus patients often have hypercoagilable blood, as
evidenced by the increased coagulation, impaired fibrinolysis, endothelial
dysfunction and platelet hyperactivity. Hyperactive platelet is a major determinant
of prothrombotic state in DM. By assessing MPV and platelet aggregation, which is a
marker of platelet activity, in patients with type 2 DM, is expected to help predict
acute events.
Objective : This research aims to know the differences of MPV and aggregation
platelet between poor glycemic control and good glycemic control group in type 2
DM patients.
Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted in 22 people with good glycemic
control and 28 people with poor glycemic control from June to August 2013. Fasting
blood samples were analyzed for CBC, HbA1c, TG and platelet aggregation. MPV and
platelet aggregation value were compared between groups using independent t test.
Results: there is no significant difference in MPV and platelet aggregation between
groups (p=0,598, p=0,464 (1µM), p=0,868 (2µM), p=0,984 (5µM), p=0,401 (10µM)).
MPV correlate significantly with platelet aggregation at 1µM and 5µM ADP
concentration in good glycemic control group (r=0,591; p=0,004 at 1µM ADP dan
r=0,521; p=0,013 at 5µM ADP). MPV correlate significantly with platelet aggregation
at 2µM ADP concentration in poor glycemic control group (r=0,405; p=0,033).
Conclusion: There was significant differences in MPV and platelet aggregation
between groups, but there is a significant correlation between MPV and platelet
aggregation in good glycemic control type 2 DM group. Objektif: Mengetahui perbedaan nilai MPV dan aggregasi trombosit pada
penderita DM tipe 2 terkontrol dan tidak terkontrol.
Metode: Penelitian dilakukan secara potong lintang pada 22 orang penderita
DM tipe 2 terkontrol dan 28 orang penderita DM tipe 2 tidak terkontrol periode
Juni hingga Agustus 2013. Sampel darah puasa diperiksa darah lengkap, HbA1c,
TG, dan aggregasi trombosit.
Hasil: Nilai MPV pada kelompok DM tipe 2 terkontrol dan tidak terkontrol tidak
berbeda bermakna (p=0,598), begitu juga nilai aggregasi trombosit dengan
konsentrasi ADP 1µM, 2µM, 5µM, dan 10µM, dengan nilai p secara berurutan
p=0,464, p=0,868, p=0,984 dan p=0,401. MPV berkorelasi bermakna dengan
aggregasi trombosit di konsentrasi ADP 1µM dan 5µM pada kelompok DM tipe 2
terkontrol (r=0,591; p=0,004 untuk ADP 1µM dan r=0,521; p=0,013 untuk ADP
5µM). MPV berkorelasi bermakna dengan aggregasi trombosit di konsentrasi
ADP 2µM pada kelompok DM tipe 2 tidak terkontrol (r=0,405; p=0,033).
Kesimpulan: Tidak dijumpai perbedaan bermakna antara nilai MPV dan aggregasi
trombosit pada kelompok DM tipe 2 terkontrol dibanding tidak terkontrol.
Terdapat hubungan bermakna antara MPV dengan aggregasi trombosit pada
kelompok DM tipe 2 terkontrol.
Collections
- Master Theses [158]