• Login
    View Item 
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Cultural Sciences
    • Master Theses (Linguistics)
    • View Item
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Cultural Sciences
    • Master Theses (Linguistics)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Aimai Dalam Implikatur Percakapan Bahasa Jepang: Kajian Pragmatik

    View/Open
    Fulltext (1.804Mb)
    Date
    2013
    Author
    Lisamayasari
    Advisor(s)
    Suryadimulya
    Muharami M, Siti
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This research deals with aimai in Japanese conversation implicature. For hiding conflict and dissimulating disagreement, Japanese people use vagueness called aimai. Speech implicature happens for the offense of conversation principles. Aimai concept as the part of norm and culture of Japanese people is very related to implicature that it is proper to be investigated. The data resource for this research is Kimi ni Todoke movie, and the analized data is the conversation in the movie. The theories used in this research are the theory of cooperative principle of Grice, the theory of politeness principle by Leech, implicature, and aimai. This is a qualitative descriptive research using heuristic analysis technique. The results of this research are: 1. Conversational implicatures caused by the offense of cooperative principle are: 1) representative implicature 2) Directive implicature 3) expressive implicature 4) comissive implicature 2. The speech implicatures caused by the offense of politeness principle are: 1) representative implicature 2) Directive implicature 3) expressive implicature 4) comissive implicature and the realization is to threaten. Aimai is found only in the offense of cooperative principle seen in explaining, flirting, refusing, protecting, trapping, avoiding, and commanding implicature. Speech implicatures are realized in Kimi ni Todoke movie by breaking the cooperative maxim for there are speaker’s implications and significancies for explaining, informing, commanding, flirting, admitting, complimenting, refusing, promising, avoiding, and blaming. Speech implicatures are realized in Kimi ni Todoke movie by breaking the politeness maxim for there are speaker’s implications and significancies for forcing, blaming, showing, critisizing, threatening, and refusing.
     
    This research deals with aimai in Japanese conversation implicature. For hiding conflict and dissimulating disagreement, Japanese people use vagueness called aimai. Speech implicature happens for the offense of conversation principles. Aimai concept as the part of norm and culture of Japanese people is very related to implicature that it is proper to be investigated. The data resource for this research is Kimi ni Todoke movie, and the analized data is the conversation in the movie. The theories used in this research are the theory of cooperative principle of Grice, the theory of politeness principle by Leech, implicature, and aimai. This is a qualitative descriptive research using heuristic analysis technique. The results of this research are: 1. Conversational implicatures caused by the offense of cooperative principle are: 1) representative implicature 2) Directive implicature 3) expressive implicature 4) comissive implicature 2. The speech implicatures caused by the offense of politeness principle are: 1) representative implicature 2) Directive implicature 3) expressive implicature 4) comissive implicature and the realization is to threaten. Aimai is found only in the offense of cooperative principle seen in explaining, flirting, refusing, protecting, trapping, avoiding, and commanding implicature. Speech implicatures are realized in Kimi ni Todoke movie by breaking the cooperative maxim for there are speaker’s implications and significancies for explaining, informing, commanding, flirting, admitting, complimenting, refusing, promising, avoiding, and blaming. Speech implicatures are realized in Kimi ni Todoke movie by breaking the politeness maxim for there are speaker’s implications and significancies for forcing, blaming, showing, critisizing, threatening, and refusing.

    URI
    http://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/39091
    Collections
    • Master Theses (Linguistics) [508]

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara (RI-USU)
    Universitas Sumatera Utara | Perpustakaan | Resource Guide | Katalog Perpustakaan
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of USU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara (RI-USU)
    Universitas Sumatera Utara | Perpustakaan | Resource Guide | Katalog Perpustakaan
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV