Leksikon Kuliner Masyarakat Pesisir Sibolga di Kota Sibolga dan Kabupaten Tapanuli Tengah (Kajian Ekolinguistik)

Abstract

This study describes the culinary lexicon of the Pesisir community in Sibolga City and Mela II Village, Tapian Nauli District, Central Tapanuli Regency, and describes the level of understanding of the Coastal community in Mela II Village, Tapian Nauli District, Central Tapanuli Regency regarding the culinary lexicon that exists in the community. the. The theory used is ecolinguistic. The ecolinguistic theory focuses its study on the interaction between languages and their environment. The methods used are qualitative and quantitative. Data collection was carried out by using the method used in this research is the listening method, speaking method, observation, and interviews, and using several techniques such as fishing techniques, note-taking techniques, and recording techniques to obtain information. The data in this study are nouns and verbs in the form of culinary lexicons in the Pesisir community in Mela II Village, Tapian Nauli District, Central Tapanuli Regency. The method used in analyzing the data in this study is the referential equivalent method. From the results of the analysis, it was concluded that there were 14 culinary types of the Pesisir community in Mela II Village, Tapian Nauli District which were classified based on (1) the lexicon of tools and materials (2) the lexicon of processing methods. Of the 14 existing culinary lexicons, there are 56 lexicons of tools and materials and 19 lexicons of processing methods, bringing the total to 75 lexicons. In describing the culinary lexicon of the Coastal community in Mela II Village, ecolinguistic parameters and the three dimensions of social praxis are used. The results of testing the level of understanding of the Pesisir Sibolga community in Mela II Village towards the culinary lexicon based on the three age groups (1) culinary lexicon types in category A were 251 (25%), category B 430 (43%), category C 134 (13%), category D 81 (8%), and category E as much as 98 (10%). (2) The lexicon of tools and materials in Category A was 3023 (76%), category B 923 (23%), category C 38 (1%), and Category D 0 (0%). Lastly, (3) processing method lexicon, category A totaled 963 (71%), category B 267 (20%), category C 71 (5.2%), and category D 48 (4%).