| dc.description.abstract | In general, safety culture is defined as the way workers behave safely when working
unsupervised. Moreover, to evaluate the safety culture maturity level, this study
used five levels, which were categorized into pathological, reactive, calculative,
proactive, and generative levels. The aim of this study was to examine the impact
of safety culture dimensions on the safety culture maturity level in order to generate
a work safety culture concept that can be implemented at PT PLN (Persero)
PUSMANPRO UPMK IV to improve the maturity of the company’s safety culture
to a more optimal level. This study is quantitative research with structural equation
modeling using SmartPLS software as a test tool for analyzing the obtained data.
In addition, a questionnaire was employed as the research instrument, and samples
were gathered using the total sampling technique, obtaining 71 respondents. Based
on the results of this study, leadership, the implementation of hazard identification,
risk assessment, and risk control (HIRARC), and organizational learning had a
significant impact on the safety culture maturity level (p value < 0.005). In contrast,
management commitment, competence, and communication did not have a partially
significant impact on the safety culture maturity level (p value > 0.005). From this
study, it could be inferred that leadership, management commitment, the
implementation of HIRARC, competence, communication, and organizational
learning could excellently and completely explain the safety culture maturity level
of 86.4%. | en_US |
